Can We Legislate a Leaner Nation?
August 31, 2007
My latest interview with Eating Liberally is about the policy implications of the “F is for Fat” study (see earlier post).
About the author
Search
Of Interest
Topics
5 a Day activity additives Advocacy agriculture alcohol American Dietetic Association antibiotics antioxidants beef bisphenol A books Bottled Water breast feeding Brian Wansink burger king calcium calorie labeling calorie labels Calories Canada Cancer center for consumer freedom Cereals Charlie Rose China chocolate cloned animals Coca Cola colbert consolidation Cooking measurements COOL corn corn sweeteners Country of Origin Labeling CSPI Dairy diabetes diet and energy drinks dietary guidelines diets e coli eat less move more eating liberally faq Farm Bill fast food fats and oils FDA fiber fish Flaxseed food art food assistance food colors Food Composition food crisis food marketing food policy food safety food stamps food systems Framingham Heart Study Fruits and Vegetables FTC functional foods genetically modified grassfed health claims hfcs hormones Hugo drinks hyperactivity India infant formula Interviews irradiation juice drinks juices junk food kellogg kids diets King Corn Korea kraft krill Labels mad cow Margarines marketing to kids McDonalds meal frequency Meat meat safety media melamine Monsanto movies natural New Zealand Nutrition Education nutrition symbols obesity obesity in kids Omega 3 Fats organic standards organics partnerships PepsiCo pesticides pet food Phil Lempert photos Portion sizes price fixing price of food pyramid Quotes from What to Eat recipes restaurants salt San Francisco Chronicle school food schools scoring systems shrek soft drinks sponsorship stevia Sugars supermarkets supplements surveys sweeteners taste tomatoes toxins trans fat TV Ads tyson foods USDA vegetarian and vegan Vending machines videos vitamins wall street Whole Grains WIC Yearly Kos
In a word, no. The gov’t has already done enough damage.
Comment by Anna — September 2, 2007 @ 11:30 am